Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Rumor: Warriors "Seriously Interested" in Chris Webber

This is big. Bigger than Dennis Rodman teamming up with former foes Scottie Pippen and the Bulls in the late 90's. Bigger than Kobe and Phil together on the Lakers. Bigger than Shaq and Kobe hi-fiving on Xmas day. Yes this is Nas and Jay-Z making up big.


Hmmm, dozen you say?
Part I | II | III

Use your shiny platinum Dada Cdubbz to make the jump!

A few days back Martin McNeel from the SacBee wrote a piece not so subtly trying to make a connection between Nellie eating at Chris Webber's joint near Sac and these two longtime bestest of buddies looking to reunite on the Warriors (see Grandma's diary Full Circle: Nelson, Webber to reunite?). It honestly seemed absolutely absurd.

Well hell might actually freeze over. Marcus Thompson II and Geoff Lepper from the CC Times have the juicy details for you:

The Warriors are "seriously interested" in free-agent big man Chris Webber, a team source confirmed Friday night.

Two team officials confirmed that the Warriors are in discussions with Webber, who played his rookie season with the Warriors in 1993-94. There is some belief the two parties are close to an agreement.

A different source confirmed that Webber and Warriors coach Don Nelson, who separated on bad terms in 1994, have talked in an attempt to put the past behind them.

Warriors executive vice president of basketball operations Chris Mullin has said a big man is on his wish list.

A few random, disjointed thoughts (hey the thought of Webber and Nellie on the Warriors together again will do that to you if you're a longtime Warrior fan):

  • I remain convinced to this day that Chris Webber (CWebb!), Latrell Sprewell (Spree for 3!), Tim Hardaway (killer crossover!), Chris Mullin (buzz cut!), Billy Owens (not nearly the bust people make him out to be), Chris Gatling (I used to wonder how he got through airport security), Victor Alexander (Big Vic!), Avery Johnson (the general!), Jud Buechler (a more athletic Brian Cardinal), and Keith Jennings (the biggest 5-7 guy in league history) would've won more than 1 NBA title together. Ronny Seikaly and CWebb might've worked too. I'd even say that whole Houston Clutch City doesn't go down in 1995.

    We were ROBBED.

  • Did Nellie really have to constantly ride this barely 20 year old kid so hard back then? Why Nellie? Why?!

  • Was this drama just a way for then new Warrior owner Chris Cohan to escape from paying big bucks to Webber for the next decade?

  • Do you think Webber has the numbers to make it into the hall of fame? What if he and Nellie got inducted together?

  • Good thing the Warriors play that slow down tempo with all those half court sets that a hobbled CWebb in the twilight of his career would thrive in. Oh wait...

  • I was 14 when the Warriors traded Webber to the Bullets for Tom Gugliotta and three 1st round picks (to make up for the ones they moved to the Magic along with Penny Hardaway). I almost cried that day. For the next few months I couldn't believe what the Warriors had done. I just didn't want to believe it. Could they really be that dumb? I wanted a schoolyard "do-over" on that trade in the worst way.

  • If you thought Troy Murphy couldn't move laterally on D, wait till you get a load of CWebb post-knee injury.

  • It's 2008, not 1994 right?

  • We might never see such an amazing 4/5 passing combo like Chris Webber and Vlade Divac ever again. Hopefully people remember them for that. It was revolutionary and may never be duplicated again. They were the complete opposite of the Twin Turnovers you see in Zach Randolph and Eddy Curry big man combo.

  • I remember a few years ago during the 2004 Western Semifinals between the Kings and Timberwolves shortly after Webber's microfracture surgery. The door was about to close on the Kings' amazing run at the turn of the century and he was saying how much he wanted to win not only for himself, but for all the people who helped him along during his career. One of the people he named was Chris Mullin. Pretty cool.

  • Is he really in good enough shape to play right now?

  • I'm not saying he's a great fit for Warrior Tempo, but here's what he brings to the table even with his age and worn down knees: fantastic passing out of the high/mid/low post, high hoops IQ (just make sure there's a timeout left at the end of the game though!), a consistent jumper from the elbow, solid rebounding, and the ability to sprinkle in a few 20-10 games here and there.

  • Good teams will find a way to slow the Warriors down especially in the playoffs and down the stretch in this tight Western Conference playoff race for big chunks of the game. Webber would give the Warriors a new dimension to keep their offense flowing in the halfcourt. Imagine Webber setting a screen for Monta a la Mike Bibby and opening up some more opportunities for Ellis to hit those midrange J's. Imagine Webber dishing the rock to a cutting Baron Davis or Matt Barnes for an easy 2 in the lane. Might be crazy enough to actually work. Hey, we all know Nellie's crazy enough to make it work.

  • Regardless of how well it pans out on the hardwood this is just a great feel good story if it goes down. For longtime Warrior fans it's the final chapter of the curse. It's a great way for Nellie and Webber to end their respective careers. Life's too short for these two proud men to close up shop without reuniting one last time. It's symbolic.

    For longtime Warrior fans it's spiritual healing. Sure it's absurd, but in that "Unstoppable Baby!" tradition this would be really special for those of us who suffered through the 12 year drought.

  • I'm "seriously interested" in picking up Webber and Payton Warrior jerseys.


If CWebb and Nellie can work it out how hard can world peace really be?

 

CDubbz to the Dubs


CWebb: "How about we meet back here in about say 14 years?"
Nellie: "Sure thing. You bring the cheap American cold ones."

Turn Back the Clock

And of course GSoM friend Jason Gurney's 2007-2008 Warriors guest preview always provides endless nostaligia, laughs, and tears: Ghosts of Seasons Past: Previewing the 2007-08 Warriors. It's Ballhypin'!

0 recs | Comment 105 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

i really really really
really really really really doubt this. REALLY...

was the team source thunder?

straight g

by RC650 on Jan 26, 2008 1:34 AM PST   0 recs

i also heard
they might give tod fuller and spree workouts this week and trade wright and buke for joe smith to help add verteran leadership :p

all joking aside, nelly is stirring the pot. he always does this kinda thing...I just don't know how much C-Webb really has to offer the dubs. In reality he's a shadow of himself. He probably would break down with all the running this team does.

straight g

by RC650 on Jan 26, 2008 1:41 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

oh i get people are talking about it
im not retarded. i just dont think (and really hope) it doesnt go down.
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 27, 2008 2:12 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

well
i think im going to take that back. its looking like he's going to be a dub. welcome aboard, c-webb. don't screw this up.
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 27, 2008 9:45 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

rc650 it gonna happen, dont worry
Just to make you happy.

 I say go for it as long they let him know, If it aint working out He will get as many mins as Kosta.

by Athletix Man on Jan 26, 2008 1:46 AM PST   0 recs

oh Golden One
youre so good at breaking my heart.
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 26, 2008 1:50 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

It will be just temp
Because once he wins a game for us, with getting a key offensive rebound. You will be in love.

by Athletix Man on Jan 26, 2008 1:57 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

c-webb + nellie part one
that was plenty for me. I know he's grown up but I think the fact remains that he can't run on the break. With Monta on the floor, the Warriors try to constantly be on-the-go. C-Webb does, however, work on the glass and try on D (looking at YOU Al Harrington). Maybe...still the warriors need to continue to build. They're a far cry away from the teams that are regarded as "a few vets away" from a championship.
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 26, 2008 2:07 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

Well if their a far cry from the championship
What could it hurt on entertainment value then. It's not like it's going to be anything besides a one year deal.

by Athletix Man on Jan 26, 2008 2:17 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

actually
Thunder and four of the Warrior Girls tell me theyre hammering out a 10 year $210million deal...
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 26, 2008 2:29 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

Actually...
The like the point made about Webber contributing in the half-court.  It's true that in virtually every game the Warriors play there's always a point when they get slowed into the half-court offense now and again.  And even a blind man can see how what an ugly sight it is.

Webber excels in the half-court because of his passing skills and smart play.  Once in a while he'll get too tricky or try to shoot a 3, but even his ugly flat jumper can be considered a threat.

For the most part i would say "no" to picking him up, but the thought of it is intrigueing.

I pray i never have to use a gun again.

by ssmokinjoe on Jan 26, 2008 1:54 AM PST   0 recs

i'd pretty excited...
if webber is signed.. though someone is going to get their minutes cut..feelings are going to get  hurt1!

by saintdee on Jan 26, 2008 1:58 AM PST   0 recs

uh...
I really hope this isn't happening.  It would be fun to watch though...

by kinetic on Jan 26, 2008 2:09 AM PST   0 recs

Anyone remember this... ?
I pray i never have to use a gun again.

by ssmokinjoe on Jan 26, 2008 2:14 AM PST   0 recs

too well
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 26, 2008 2:30 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

mmm
something tells me this would be good.

why is it neccasary that c-webb runs the break like monta?

how many times does monta get on a break and pull out resulting in others to run up the court.. not all too much.

he doesnt need 30+ minutes to be effective so its not like he will get thrashed...

bring him in when it becomes a half court game or when an opposing 4 gets hot.

The Beginning of the "We Believe" Movement of Melbourne, Australia.

by DoomBizzle on Jan 26, 2008 3:05 AM PST   0 recs

i guess
but are you really willing to risk potential have a Chernobyl sized meltdown in the locker room AGAIN?
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 26, 2008 3:11 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

Is it April 1st already?
You call me ancient, I say "oldguysrule"

by commish on Jan 26, 2008 6:04 AM PST   0 recs

we need something...
i dont care if the warriors sign lisa leslie! as long as we get a BIG MAN! im all for it!
win or lose... playoffs or lottery... i gotta luv them dubz! GSW 4 Life!!!

by gogomaplata on Jan 26, 2008 6:46 AM PST   0 recs

Uh
Lisa Leslie is a big woman, not a big man....and she has the size of a shooting guard in the NBA.

Tony.psd = Da Man

http://adonalobsessed.blogspot.com/

by Zorgon on Jan 26, 2008 12:58 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Atma Bro +1
The Half Court playoff strategy finally makes sense through all this noise of Webber and Payton.  Could these two Vets be just using us in order to get better deals from the Celts or the like?  On a national stage, the Webber story would be excellent, even Chuck would have to approve, right?

Barnett always mentioned that Bill Russell never stepped past half court on a fast break.  He was to always defend the rim.  Imagine the outlet passes Webber would make to increase the Fast Break opportunities.  He could ignite us like Barnes can but stay back and defend the rim.

JB and Zack Vank also chimed in with these observations, so this blog really did add something to make sense of the outlandish rumors.  

Your Cathartic Warriors, where time and experience really does heal all wounds.  Webber is finally ready to fulfill his destiny with Nelson and we are ready to commence our historic run to a Championship.

Or maybe, Nellie did want to munch on some wings and wash it down with a cold Michelob.  This could be an excellent smoke screen to get Haslem.

by eshock on Jan 26, 2008 7:24 AM PST   0 recs

Do people still drink Michelob?
If he was spotted enjoying a Lowenbrau, I'd be really concerned that he'd be trying to re-sign Alton Lister.

by bloodsweatndonuts on Jan 26, 2008 12:45 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

What it tells me
To me it says that Mullin will not be making any trades. If you look at our roster, to get an impact guy we have to trade Harrington but that would break up the chemistry. By adding a veteran, Nellie will actually give Webber minutes. Our bench gets deeper. We now have a lost post backup. And our future remains the same. How else to we help this team if Mullin wants the core to stay? (Just talking, dont need 8 trade scenarios.) I like the move. Because the basketball gods have not been kind to us since his departure. Maybe this is the ok, ok, its all back in place moment that lets us get some breaks for awhile.

by Grandma on Jan 26, 2008 8:26 AM PST   0 recs

His salary
is why he would have to be a part of any trade. No one else makes enough.

by Grandma on Jan 26, 2008 1:21 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Hey, Atma Bro!
How're you doing?  Just a brilliant and beautiful post you made.  Just beautiful...  

You stated you almost cried when they traded CWebb all those years ago.  Well, I DID CRY!     The golden franchise was destroyed and it took years with the return of Nellie and the Trades bringing B Davis, AL Harrington, and C Jack to the Ws for them to reach the playoffs again.

I agree, it'll be special to reunite the two major players in the Warriors meltdown and how they could end their careers together with a championship.  I think both have major major regrets of what transpired though I had doubts about Webber ; but if CWebb signs this will confirm this.

Do you think it'll be like when the legendary Rick Barry returned to the Warriors from the ABA in the early '70's and all was forgiven between him and Franklin Mieuli.  Al Attles and the team welcomed him back with open arms!  And you know what happened a few years later in 1974-75!

Peace,
Kirk

by kirkkazas on Jan 26, 2008 9:19 AM PST   0 recs

Hey, Atma Bro!
How're you doing?  Just a brilliant and beautiful post you made.  Just beautiful...  

You stated you almost cried when they traded CWebb all those years ago.  Well, I DID CRY!     The golden franchise was destroyed and it took years with the return of Nellie and the Trades bringing B Davis, AL Harrington, and C Jack to the Ws for them to reach the playoffs again.

I agree, it'll be special to reunite the two major players in the Warriors meltdown and how they could end their careers together with a championship.  I think both have major major regrets of what transpired though I had doubts about Webber ; but if CWebb signs this will confirm this.

 This is so preposterous that Nellie might make it work!

Do you think it'll be like when the legendary Rick Barry returned to the Warriors from the ABA in the early '70's and all was forgiven between him and Franklin Mieuli.  Al Attles and the team welcomed him back with open arms!  And you know what happened a few years later in 1974-75!

Peace,
Kirk

by kirkkazas on Jan 26, 2008 9:21 AM PST   0 recs

silly & serious
disposing of the silly first
  • GSW would not have beaten Dream, Drexler & Co. at their peak
  • CWebb is not HOF
  • we don't need CWebb to set screens for Monta, anyone on the current roster would do nicely if Nelson would just put in a play other than a pick & roll
seriously

CWebb is not a low post threat that would carry us offensively in a slower tempo'd playoff situation. Anyone who watched Sac saw that he was best at the elbow/high-post passing to cutters and using his midrange J. That fits his aging knees yet is a complete misfit for our team. He will be inside, with his defender, he will not demand a double team and he will not open up shooters as a result. He would fit well with a team like his former Pistons, in his hometown of Detroit, who are going to compete for the ECF and maybe a ring. Or maybe the Heat, replacing the role Alonzo Morning had and working off DWade. Regardless, with GSW he'd be a backup C to Andris, we'd still play small & run, and we're not going to WCF if that's our "big" move this month. If you are CWebb which way do you turn? Before you reply that he may not have the choice, ask yourself whether we really should want him if even Detroit doesn't sign him cheaply when his role is perfectly suited to the situation.

Nelson is to blame for not being able to manage CWebb's immaturity and maybe he's simply taking the opportunity to put regrets to rest over a cold beverage with his former player. Men of his age often do things like that.

CWebb of the past is not coming to save the present dubs, if he comes at all ... if this is the big move, I'm big time bumm'n

by hardcore on Jan 26, 2008 9:42 AM PST   0 recs

Thank you.
I agree completely.

by flaaron on Jan 26, 2008 9:46 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

C Webb
What makes you think that if we sign C Webb he won't be used right? Isn't Nellie supposed to be good at using a player's strengths?

We already have plays that initiate from the high post, even with Biedrins sometimes. Webber would fit into out offense just fine.

He's definitely a defensive liability against a lot of bigs, but if there's nobody out there he can guard, then Nellie won't play him. What's wrong with that? It's not like we're losing anybody when we sign him.

Ya, he can't run with us, but most of our breaks are completed by our little guys anyways. How often does Biedrins finish a fast break?

Basically, I think this move would suck if we had a crappy coach, but lucky for us, we don't. We have Nellie.

Can't expect a "big move" every year...

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jan 26, 2008 11:21 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

don't expect a big move every year
but when we have millions in a TPE and millions of space under the luxury tax it's not too much to ask that gets used intelligently

as for Nelson's use of CWebb - it's not that I doubt Nelson's a good coach (I defend him regularly on this sight when warranted). If you don't agree that CWebb doesn't fit you're entitled to your opinion. My twenty-odd years as a coach entitles me to mine.

by hardcore on Jan 26, 2008 11:47 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

part of my point about Nellie
is that if C Webb indeed doesn't fit as you predict, he just won't play him. Crappier coaches would feel pressure to play him. So the risk-reward ratio is very nice for this move.
It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jan 26, 2008 7:49 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

NBA Film entitled "Redemption"
New to the blog, I love what you all have compiled here.  It is like a record of anguish I've personally endured by myself since RunTMC.  Now I know where my brothers are at.  

You've chronicled the Dirty Dozen already, no need to rehash the past.  And I think that is what is going on here for both coach and player.  For their own sakes they need this cure.  

If Webber does join, and takes the Dubs over the edge to a Championship, wouldn't it be like USA Hockey Team beating the USSR for us, long anguished Warrior fans?  We would NEVER forget where we were when it happened.

by ssgmack on Jan 26, 2008 10:37 AM PST   0 recs

Yeee!
Chris Webber!!! That guy may be a little slow, but his good eyes could be very useful for us vs the elite teams that force us to play a half court game. He can pop a jumper pretty consistently if they keep open at the elbow and he has a good eye to hit one of our guys along the 3 point line. I would love to see Webber in a Warriors uniform!
Ballin

by ballin on Jan 26, 2008 10:54 AM PST   0 recs

Something to offer?
Well here's a mix of C-Webb in '06-'07...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=292Qr--fg8E&feature=related

by Joe Frank on Jan 26, 2008 11:47 AM PST   0 recs

Webber
I think it would be a great low risk option for us, as long as Webber is agreeable to a small role and isn't expecting to be our starting power forward.  Our only concern would be disrupting our team chemistry and learning to play together. The upside is that it can generate more national attention for us to market our team. Let's hope he's been working out and has something to prove.

by shootda3 on Jan 26, 2008 11:52 AM PST   0 recs

what the hell?
why are the dubs so interested in old people who can't play anymore?

by AJC3317 on Jan 26, 2008 12:18 PM PST   0 recs

Because they are thin
and have little to trade

by Zig on Jan 26, 2008 1:09 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Webber and the curse.
I remember the ultimate team... it makes me sad to think we were close to being a consistent playoff team.  Think about it.  We had a starting 5 of:
PG:  Tim Hardaway
SG:  Latrell Sprewell
SF:  Chris Mullin
PF:  Chris Webber
C:   Rony Seikely
and a bench of
Victor Alexander (pretty smooth 3 pt shot from the top of the key)
Chris Gatling (energizer off the bench who rebounded at a fairly high clip)
Keith Jennings (great pg off the bench... also provided energy)
Ricky Pierce (a three pt threat off the bench... seasoned veteran)
Clifford Rozier/Carlos Rogers (both rookie bigs who could step in and provide adequate D while running the floor)
and whatever free agents would have came in.  I agree w/ Atma... We seriously could have continued to make noise in the playoffs and with an upset or two, possbily end up in the finals or w/ a championship.  Sure it was a pipe dream... but it did end w/ the trading of Chris Webber (why couldn't he let go of Billy Owens?)

Now, I truly believe that if we drop Hudson and sign Webber to a small contract for the rest of the season, that it would be far more helpful that it would be hurtful.  First off, we already have a vocal lockerroom leader in Baron Davis, so this talk about breaking down the lockerroom morale should not be a factor, especially at this stage of his career.  He understands what it takes to win (all the years in Sac help) and he CAN pose as a consistent threat in the half court setting.  

I know he wont run the floor, but you saw what happened in the Jazz series in last year's playoffs; their ability to keep a strong guard on Baron Davis while having the ability to run an adequate transition defense was enough to slow down our run & gun style to the half court setting on a consistent basis.  Webber can definately provide us with a big who can stretch the floor and pass the ball well without being a poor defensive liability.  

Another factor is our slew of line-up possibilties.  If Webber doesn't fit into the game plan, then we have the players necessary to not have to play him.  Nelson should be smart enough to recognize his strengths and weaknesses and know when he should be in the game and when not to be in the game.  If Beans mins are inconsistent, Webbers can be too.  

I definately would welcome Webber back to the bay... I'd just expect a little bit of "John Starks to Chicago" treatment to occur in the beginning.  

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

by mightymadskillz on Jan 26, 2008 12:29 PM PST   0 recs

yo!
remember when Gatling became an ALL STAR!  

by RubberDubDubs on Jan 26, 2008 4:01 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Yeah...
when he was in cleveland as a replacement.  That was CRAZY!
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

by mightymadskillz on Jan 28, 2008 11:24 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

I've thought about this
For a few days now. Someone at my work bought a Record Bee and I saw the story in the paper and I have been mulling it over.

This is my take. After some consideration I would embrace the signing of Webber.

The team could use another low post player and I don't think that can be disputed. The reason Webber did not resign with Detroit is that Detroit wanted to play and see what some of their younger players could do. With the Warriors at this point in time our younger bigs are not getting substantial time. If either POB, Perovic or Wright were getting about 12 minutes a game a night and doing well my opinion would be different. But since they are not I would welcome Webber to the team because it is not like it is going to negatively affect the development of our youth any different then it is now.

POB is for all intense and purposes gone next year. Perovic I have no idea, I was not able to watch the Bucks game, but being he only played one game it is obvious he is not ready now. And Brandon Wright has not gotten consistent time this season as he needs to bulk up.

Being these young guys can't get any playing time early in the season, what makes it seem that as the season progresses that would be any different? As the regular season comes to a close, and the games get tougher as teams via for playoff position and in the playoffs I do not see them getting any more time. Remember last season down the stretch that Nellie shortened his bench? We didn't see as much of Kelenna for instance. He seemed to shorten his bench down the stretch and the playoffs to guys that he knew he could believe in.

By adding Webber when he goes to the shorten the bench routine his rotation will be one player deeper then before because of Webber's veteran status and that he has been there before. If they bring in Webber and release Troy Hudson it seems to be a solid move to me. I'm not expecting miracles from Webber but I think he will be able to find a niche on this team in a positive way.

Now on the flip side if the Warriors were to sign GP and release Watson I would be very upset. And the only reason that my view there would be different is that Watson as a young player is playing and playing very well. No need to bring in an older vet for a younger player that is producing.

I think that Webber signing will give the Warriors a little more attention around the league. If a 'name'(I did not see impact production) player decides to come and join the team then it might make more potential FA's give the Warriors a second look. Their are certain cities and teams that FA's look to go to, I do not expect a Webber or GP signing to change the big name franchises like Lakers, Miami, New York, etc for FA destinations but it might make 2nd and 3rd tier FA's more receptable to give us a look.

So in summary, I would welcome CWebb because he would not negatively affect a young players development any more so then it is now. He would give the team one more player that Nellie would trust when he begins to shorten his bench, and Webber could potentially give us an added dimension to our team that we do not have currently if used in the right way.

by jpgarfunkle on Jan 26, 2008 12:33 PM PST   0 recs

you've won me over with that post,
I'm now in the not-that-mad at the "webber movement", since c-webb is way better that thud.
Best duo since...

by Tim N Chris Burger on Jan 26, 2008 12:53 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Right on!
Glad that I got some love from that post!

by jpgarfunkle on Jan 26, 2008 1:19 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Seriously,
thats some basic rational thinking that Mullin is hopefully using.  I always hoped that CWebb and Nellie could patch things up.  As for GP and Watson, EXACTLY my thoughts.  I wouldn't mind the Dubs sign GP but not at the extent of sending Watson back to the D league.  The Dubs need to keep KBLX/Kabukie2.

by RubberDubDubs on Jan 26, 2008 4:07 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Too bad C-Webb refuses
to play in the low post anymore. Even so I think he could help this team, he could backup both the 5 and the 4, while bringing some sweet passing to the frontcourt. This move would help the Dubs, but I'm not sure if it is worth the risk of messing up the chemistry.

by Elcold on Jan 26, 2008 1:06 PM PST   0 recs

think of it this way
it is a way bigger upgrade from thud as jp said, and maybe he could help develop some of our younger guys like wright orsomething. there are multiple possibilities of how we can play him now even with his weak knees

by GSwarrior on Jan 26, 2008 1:49 PM PST   0 recs

I'm down with Webber...
...if he's down to be here. I think his passing ability probably makes up for the diminshed athleticism. He'd also have to take a clear backseat to Baron and Jackson as far as leadership is concerned, so I'm not worried about chemistry. Webber will give us a guy who can cut up a zone inside with his passing, which I think we can all agree would be helpful.

by Zack Vank on Jan 26, 2008 1:55 PM PST   0 recs

is it just possible that
we are projecting our hopes and delusions upon CWebb?

posting videos from years ago, when even an announcer proclaims that he's "turned back the clock on that move"

projecting CWebb's passing ability into an offense we don't run

projecting CWebb as a low post offensive presence

some claim he'd be an asset on defense

deluding ourselves to think he will come and develop our young players?!

rationalizing that CWebb would be better than THud - yes, so would anyone suggested on this site since THud is done

from a fan perspective would it be "interesting" - sure, but from a basketball perspective are we any better as club with CWebb as he is now???

the only thing that CWebb would add is a barrier to do something meaningful with the TPE that could make us a serious threat in the playoffs and maybe even beyond

We must expect more from the front office than this - adding CWebb now is the equivalent of giving Mullin the ultimate cop-out, Nelson too for that matter (if we don't make the playoffs or do well, think CWebb will escape blame?)

we have the space and vaunted flexibility via the trade exception from the JRich trade to make a significant upgrade - let's hope for a better option than this ...

by hardcore on Jan 26, 2008 2:27 PM PST   0 recs

of course that's what we're doing, get over it...
and by the way... all the video links posted are of Webber's '06 - '07 season not "posting video from years ago"

If you're going to just wine away, at least do it with some integrity in your argument

by Joe Frank on Jan 26, 2008 3:36 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

integrity?!
every player can get a highlight video of splices - that's hardly impressive evidence, and considering that the first 20% of it or so is old footage, dating back from Kings and 76ers games, ya some of it is from years ago so shut your trap about the video

I posted both logical and statistical evidence - instead of trying to attack someone's character why don't you try doing likewise?

so for a lack of integrity - look in the mirror

by hardcore on Jan 26, 2008 3:58 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

+1
RIP mAC dRE aka aNDrE mACAsSi aka MuHaMMeD I-E aka pILL cLinToN

by jmefrisco on Jan 26, 2008 6:13 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

76ers
was last year, and there was only a photo of Webber in a Kings jersey. The entire video was made of highlights from last season. Personally I think he would be a solid pickup, but you make some valid points. The outdated highlights video argument is not one of them

by belilaugh on Jan 26, 2008 8:52 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

some names?
Honestly, JB, you sound like a broken record sometimes.  This prototypical 4 you seem to ALWAYS bring up that will be the dubs savior if mulson blew their wad to trade for - does HE even have a name.  Who is this modern day GSW messiah of the low post, in your opinion?  I'd REALLY like to know.

The thing is...  pretty much EVERY NBA team can use a guy like that.  They don't exactly grow on trees.  So availability is an issue.  

And people on this site... hell, b-ball fans, in general, underestimate the difficulties of REAL NBA trades.  There is no such thing as a forced trade; BOTH parties must agree to the terms.  SO if any of the involved parties feel that they are getting fleeced they can ALWAYS walk away from the whole deal.  Fairness of a trade, whether it be real or assumed, IS a given.  Expecting GMs to agree on a deal on the 1st try is like expecting your girlfriend to forget it's Valentine's Day on Feb14th.  Hell, I'd guesstimate that it takes about 10 failed deals to make 1 executed NBA trade.

Lastly, since a trade would entail losing someone on the roster( and most likely someone productive) it holds a much higher risk of being a lemon of deal, then a straight FA acquisition.  Lets get real.  You've got to be out of your mind if you think mp2, POB or Zero Threat Position will snag the dubs your mythical KG clone; someone GOOD has to be lost for the w's to get anyone of value.  Bottom line: THERE ARE'NT ANY GUYS IN THE NBA THAT IS "GETTABLE" FOR WARRIORS THAT MEET YOUR CRITERIA, and no one that is available now is worth trading for if it means messing with what the dubs have now.

That being said, a WEBBER move, as blah as it sounds, is a low risk, medium reward deal that doesn't take away any of my favorite warriors players.  Can't be mad at that.

Best duo since...

by Tim N Chris Burger on Jan 27, 2008 3:00 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

+1
wait...im not the only GSoMer on at 3 am?
straight g

by RC650 on Jan 27, 2008 3:25 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

Getting Real-istic
Three points - First, if you read all this I'll be surprised and I'll resist the temptation to take issue with your snippy girlfriend analogies or misrepresentations of my previous (and not unfounded) claims regarding obtaining KG. Second, I've been pretty consistent on this sight for holding Mullin accountable for his previous screw-ups, and using the TPE intelligently now is the final step he can take in trying to balance the years of damage he did with the lame contracts he handed out which served to perpetuate the playoff drought. Third, you might notice that since Olympicmike pointed out that we would not be using much space under the luxury cap threshold to sign CWebb, I've backed-off the counter-argument because it would not preclude another move using that space & TPE. I am swayed by intelligent factual responses more than snippy retorts. That said, I'm skeptical CWebb would come here for the vet min after turning LAL down.

I have been consistent in calling for moves to deepen the PF and have consistently used specific players along the way (in addition to KG, who I think we can safely put aside for this discussion) including Mikki Moore last summer, Darko, etc. and lately Villanueva. So I have been making specific suggestions at points in the season where they've been available - the real question remains where are yours? What are you contributing to the conversation?

Looking at the roster we have to agree that we have limited trade-able resources. The following are un-tradable imo for either talent, contract, or injury reasons: Baron Davis, Troy Hudson, Stephen Jackson. The following won't bring back much in a trade unless we can use them to balance salaries or find a team looking to dump a talented big with a hefty contract (who also meets our needs) imo: Marco Belinelli, Mickael Pietrus, Kosta Perovic, Patrick O'Bryant, Matt Barnes.

That leaves players other teams would like from our roster: Monta Ellis, Kelenna Azubuike, Al Harrington, Austin Croshere, Brandan Wright, and our only Center Andris Biedrins. Logic suggests we'd get more for Monta than Buke and we ought not trade both. Harrington could be traded if the partner was off-loading an even bigger contract. Croshere actually would have trade value (and value to us) if he could play a whole week without being hurt so on second thought he probably doesn't have any trade value at the moment. BWright is an enigma much like Darko was a couple years ago, but another team will want him. Biedrins obviously only gets moved for a considerable upgrade. It's not out of the question to use the TPE to acquire a player with a big price tag while dealing some of the aforementioned players. Mind you, I'm not anxious to trade Monta, or Andris, but no one is untouchable in the right deal.   

Let's agree that with the exception of Seattle (who has Kurt Thomas, another PF I've consistently suggested we could obtain without breaking up any of our core), any deal we make is more likely with an Eastern Conference franchise. Remember - either or both of Monta & Andris are available for a deal for the right player(s).

Boston - not much of a match unless you are convinced Perkins will make up the difference in scoring with improved defense, I'd consider trading Harrington for him but we'd have to match salaries.
Toronto - assuming Bosh is unavailable, I would consider including Monta in a deal for Bargnani.
New Jersey - having just seen them, I'm reminded that Sean Williams was available to us when Mullin picked his boy Bellinelli. Boone is mobile enough and big but not enough of an upgrade and I don't see the match.
Philadelphia - I'd suggested Dalembert in the past, but his contract reminds me of the albatrosses Mullin gave out previously and though he'd fit in on the court would hurt us financially. Reggie Evans is not an upgrade.
New York - bigs are not a match to Nelson.
Detroit - Wallace & McDyess aren't likely to be moved, but Jason Maxiel tore us up and could fit into our system; though undersized he's strong and mobile, and young.
Cleveland - may be getting desperate enough to give LeBron help that they'd consider moving Gooden, but at what price? Would we take Hughes' contract to make it happen?
Indiana - not happening.
Chicago - I'd gladly take the problem-child Noah off their hands!
Milwaukee - in addition to the aforementioned Villaneuva, Yi isn't the PF solution by himself, but sure would be welcomed by at least some GSoMers! Seriously, would we consider Andris in a trade for Bogut? I would if the package was a fit.
Orlando - no match.
Washington - Andray Blatche is the type of young PF that would fit in well athletically and is not getting many minutes and with Etan Thomas returning Blatche might be available.
Atlanta - others on GSoM have mentioned Williams and Pachulia, but I don't think they are "difference makers"
Charlotte is thin at guard and deep in forwards - would they be attracted by Monta? Would you ask for Gerald Wallace? Put a package together and include BWright? Nazr Mohammed could be had for a lot less. Wallace playing PF for us could be exciting.
Miami - Haslem is the obvious fit to our needs, what would it take? Monta? Would you?

Lastly, as for sounding like a broken record - when Mullin addresses the need there will be no more need to hammer the point, similar to OZ championing the backup PG issue. Since I do this part-time and he's getting big bucks, maybe it's more realistic to expect him to solve this, eh?

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2008 11:34 AM PST to parent up   0 recs

touche...
that's what I'm talking about...

Good list...

Although, some of the trades involving monta, I'd be a little hesitant to bandwagon-jump if it was a midseason trade, only because the to dubs are so dependant on montas contributions now.  The effect of losing him would take a while for the team to get used to REGARDLESS of who we ge back in trade.  In this years playoff race even a two game slip up can be costly.

Also, I still don't think adding webber at the cost of thud hampers our ability to make a more significant move later down the line.

Oh, And about MY RECOMMENDATIONS for the TRADE-A-DUB madness, I'd rather not add to that mess.  Besides, I wasn't the one bashing the c-webb trade rumor, so the it REALLY isn't on me to add names to the discussion.  Awareness is my gift to this thread; just because I dont' chip in names and stats, doesn't mean my words are worthless.  I look at trades as a last resort, my friend.

Best duo since...

by Tim N Chris Burger on Jan 27, 2008 1:01 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

yup, yup, and ...
agree - last season we pulled it together after the trade as JRich got healthier and they learned to play together

agree - see new diary, referenced you btw

... and you do not have to offer up trade ideas, your choice and it does take more time and effort, but I for one appreciate substantive posts particularly from regular and coherent posters such as yourself

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2008 1:57 PM PST to parent up   0 recs